Oh well, long time since I wrote about the Asian Financial Crisis, now I got to submit an assignment -an analysis of a newspaper article of my choice. So, I picked up an article at the The Economist regarding the failure of the Cancun Talks. So here it goes:
The fifth Ministerial conference was set for a very modest task of reviewing the progress of negotiations and providing necessary political guidance. But even this goal was not met. This raises serious issues on not just relevance of WTO but also on the position of free trade in the world economy.
Scope of Cancun Talks
"Without prejudging the outcome, member governments committed themselves to comprehensive negotiations aimed at:
market access: substantial improvements
exports subsidies: reductions of, with a view to phasing out, all forms of these
domestic support: substantial reductions for supports that distort trade"
-Doha Ministerial Declaration, 2001
Cancun Ministerial Talks was after the ambitious agreement by the WTO to remove Agricultural tariffs and get cheaper drugs to developing countries to combat the AIDS scourge. At the Doha Round every nation agreed in principle to the above ideas in addition to the "Singapore Issues". Doha Round succeeded mainly due to leadership from U.S (in the wake of the September 11 attacks). With U.S agreeing in principle to many concessions (subject to many other conditions), the road to truely multilateral trade seemed clear.
After the Doha Round, plenty of efforts were made to come to a consensus on major issues. In fact, any change to World Trade Rules requires unanimous agreement from all members of the WTO and any change, indeed, would require nothing short of a miracle.
This is more obvious when sorry tales of missed deadlines and unpenetrable deadlocks come to light. Several contentious issues between the developed and developing nations have resulted in another deadlock in Cancun.